| Indicator 3D - Accreditation of Degree-Granting Programs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | |
| |
| Programs as noted in 1/00 'Closer Look' - Reported 8/1/99 and found in Section 3 - Page 47 | Current Status of Programs - As of March 2000, Programs that have gained accreditation | 3D accreditation as measured for PF - *Programs that may not currently be accredited, but meet 4/2002 Performance Funding Deadline | |
| | | | | | | numer | denom | PF value | |
| INSTITUTION | # of Programs Accredited | # of Programs Eligible for Accreditation | % Accredited | # of Programs Accredited | # of Programs Eligible for Accreditation | % Accredited | #of Programs Accredited or on Track | # of Programs Eligible for Accreditation | % | |
| Clemson | 11 | 12 | 92% | 11 | 12 | 92% | 12* | 12 | 100% | |
| USC Columbia | 23 | 23 | 100% | 23 | 23 | 100% | 23 | 23 | 100% | |
| MUSC | 16 | 16 | 100% | 16 | 16 | 100% | 16 | 16 | 100% | |
| the Citadel | 3 | 4 | 75% | 3 | 4 | 75% | 3 | 4 | 75% | |
| Coastal Carolina | 2 | 5 | 40% | 2 | 5 | 40% | 2 | 5 | 40% | |
| College of Charleston | 4 | 7 | 57% | 7 | 9 | 78% | 6 | 7 | 86% | | |
| Francis Marion | 3 | 6 | 50% | 4 | 6 | 67% | 4 | 6 | 67% | |
| Lander | 3 | 7 | 43% | 4 | 7 | 57% | 5* | 7 | 71% | |
| SC State | 8 | 13 | 62% | 9 | 14 | 64% | 11* | 14 | 79% | | |
| USC Aiken | 4 | 4 | 100% | 4 | 4 | 100% | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| USC Spartanburg | 3 | 6 | 50% | 4 | 6 | 67% | 4 | 6 | 67% | |
| Winthrop | 12 | 12 | 100% | 12 | 12 | 100% | 12 | 12 | 100% | |
| USC Beaufort | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| USC Lancaster | 1 | 1 | 100% | 1 | 1 | 100% | 1 | 1 | 100% | |
| USC Salkehatchie | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| USC Sumter | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| USC Union | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Aiken Tech | 1 | 4 | 25% | 1 | 4 | 25% | 2* | 4 | 50% | | | |
| Central Carolina Tech | 3 | 6 | 50% | 4 | 6 | 67% | 6* | 6 | 100% | |
| Chesterfield Marlboro Tech | 0 | 2 | 0% | 0 | 2 | 0% | 0 | 2 | 0% | |
| Denmark Tech | 0 | 3 | 0% | 0 | 3 | 0% | 2* | 3 | 67% | |
| Florence Darlington Tech | 13 | 13 | 100% | 13 | 13 | 100% | 13 | 13 | 100% | |
| Greenville Tech | 16 | 17 | 94% | 16 | 17 | 94% | 17* | 17 | 100% | |
| Horry-Georgetown Tech | 5 | 8 | 63% | 6 | 8 | 75% | 8* | 8 | 100% | |
| Midlands Tech | 21 | 21 | 100% | 16 | 16 | 100% | 16 | 16 | 100% | | |
| Orangeburg-Calhoun Tech | 10 | 11 | 91% | 7 | 8 | 88% | 7 | 8 | 88% | | |
| Piedmont Tech | 7 | 8 | 88% | 7 | 8 | 88% | 9* | 9 | 100% | |
| Spartanburg Tech | 9 | 10 | 90% | 9 | 10 | 90% | 10* | 10 | 100% | |
| Tech Coll. of Low Country | 4 | 4 | 100% | 4 | 4 | 100% | 4 | 4 | 100% | |
| Tri-County Tech | 6 | 8 | 75% | 6 | 8 | 75% | 8* | 8 | 100% | |
| Trident Tech | 13 | 15 | 87% | 13 | 15 | 87% | 13 | 15 | 87% | |
| Williamsburg Tech | 2 | 2 | 100% | 1 | 1 | 100% | 1 | 1 | 100% | | |
| YORK TECH | 7 | 8 | 88% | 8 | 8 | 100% | 8 | 8 | 100% | |
| | | | | |
| CHE, Division of Planning, Assessment & Performance Funding | | | | |
| March 28, 2000 | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |